Liens et nouvelles
Une analyse de la faillite du rapport de la comission. Cette vidéo montre les manquements et les mensonges des différents rapport en confrontant les témoignages direct et les conclusions de la commission. Approche très interressante.
Why didn't the elevators work in the Trade Center that day? I'll tell you.
Many thanks to NK44 and MirageMemories for the English translation at
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/1701709/1/
NIST clips, Port Authority radio transcripts, dozens of witnesses help describe the plan to disable the firefighting effort, to keep the cover story alive: FIRE induced collapse...
This is the expert-packed feature-length,Pre-Release v1.3, Low-Res documentary by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
GC: And the other questions about buildings free-falling into their footprints… Building 7—
CM: Look … I spent last September ’11 in the home of a woman who is afflicted with cancer… because she lived near the World Trade center. And all of that dust came into her apartment… and she had to clean it up. She will never figure into any of the statistics about who has been affected—her situation will never count… but it counts to me, and to all of the other members of the 911 Truth Community.
GC: Let’s explore another controversial issue linked to you. … Ms. McKinney, what does the number “88794” signify for you?
CM: That was the number that was assigned to me by the Israeli prison system when—on my second attempt to get into Gaza—I was kidnapped on the high...
Voici comment est traitée une agente de la CIA après qu'elle ait commencé à dire ce qu'elle savait du 11 septembre 2001. Arrétée sans motif valable, accusée sur des preuves secrètes, détenue plus d'un an et enfin libérée comme étant folle. Il n'y a qu'à regarder sa page sur wikipedia pour voir quelle est la théorie...
J'ai signé... Est ce que c'est réséervé au citoyens américain ? on dirait que non
The Legend of 9/11 — 10 Years On by Anthony Lawson This video concentrates on the two major 9/11 issues: The Unidentified Planes and The Controlled Demolitions. Nothing else.
At least six films about the 7/7 London bombings are circulating on the Internet, here listed. You can order them all on a DVD from Culture Shop. In different ways they all investigate some of the most serious holes in the official account of that day%u2019s events.
At 4pm on Thursday 12th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad%u2019Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to «pervert the course of justice».
First of all, and before I deal with what I want to deal with in this article, I want to explain that I am not going to deny the truth or exactness of what appears on the tape or the exactness or truth of the existence of the tape itself, despite my own convictions regarding this commotion and these claims. Thus, I will suppose that the existence of the tape is a fact and that what appears in it is exactly correct in order that I might discuss this topic from the angle that I want to deal with and only for the sake of argument.
We bring to the attention of our readers the following text of Osama bin Laden's interview with Ummat, a Pakistani daily, published in Karachi on September 28, 2001. It was translated into English by the BBC World Monitoring Service and made public on September 29, 2001.
There is also much media discussion of Washington%u2019s anger that Pakistan didn%u2019t turn over bin Laden, though surely elements of the military and security forces were aware of his presence in Abbottabad. Less is said about Pakistani anger that the U.S. invaded their territory to carry out a political assassination. Anti-American fervor is already very high in Pakistan, and these events are likely to exacerbate it. The decision to dump the body at sea is already, predictably, provoking both anger and skepticism in much of the Muslim world.
Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job.
With the Media fawning over a collapsing story of the Bin Laden Kill, and making the absurd statement that our Govt. / and or Military Men wouldn%u2019t make things up (for National Security of Course) %u2026 We thought it might be helpful to post a few past incidences of outright fabrications that the media %u201Cfell for%u201D and that could not be...
Until they get some sort of personal jolt, people don't realize just how bad things have become over the last ten years. Those behind the "Establishment" are very careful not to interrupt the booze and diversions, but things are rapidly deteriorating. The downward spiral is just slow enough that the vast majority of people, even within the "truth-movement", cannot see it happening from day to day.
The incident this week in Abbottabad, Pakistan was always intended to be %u201Cself-discrediting.%u201D In a time of rigged voting machines and rule by decree, a time of military tribunals and tortured defendants, the concept of evidence and accountability is a joke. Consider the current bin Laden farce what it was intended to be, the American government reminding its people and the people of the world how little respect it has for them.
Even though World Trade Center Building 7 is said to have been the first steel-framed building in history to undergo total collapse due to fire, there were many people who knew the building was going to collapse long before it did. In this presentation, the evidence for this peculiar foreknowledge will be summarized and its significance discussed. The argument will be made...
Argument followed but Walker, and fellow judges Cabranes and Winter, seemed more interested in making sure that Veale was properly licensed to practice before the court than the stark legal issues presented by the appeal. The appeal is from a ruling by then District Court Judge, now 2nd Circuit Court Judge, Denny Chin, dismissing Ms. Gallop%u2019s lawsuit with prejudice, writing that the allegations contained there are %u201Cimplausible%u201D and the product of %u201Ccynical delusion and fantasy.%u201D
What's wrong with mainstream experts?
There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7). NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest. They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away. They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building. Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis. By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating the testimony of...
9-11 Was an Inside Job Perpetrated by Elements of the U.S. Government and Israeli Mossad
The Private Central Banks, such as Federal Reserve Bank, Bank of England,
Control the Supply of Money and the Interest Rate in Most Developed Countries
Professor of political science at Long Island University and chief expert on Operation Condor, J. Patrice McSherry, sums up U.S. involvement in the series of assassinations as follows: %u201CU.S. military and intelligence officials supported and collaborated with Condor as a secret partner or sponsor.%u201D That indeed seems to be the case. Not only does the Anglo-American establishment sponsor terrorist attacks abroad, it apparently does not shy away from allowing them to proceed within the U.S.
Colonel Wilkerson, a long-time critic of the Bush Administration’s approach to counter-terrorism and the war in Iraq, claimed that the majority of detainees — children as young as 12 and men as old as 93, he said — never saw a US soldier when they were captured. He said that many were turned over by Afghans and Pakistanis for up to $5,000. Little or no evidence was produced as to why they had been taken.
He also claimed that one reason Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld did not want the innocent detainees released was because “the detention efforts would be revealed as the incredibly confused operation that they were”. This was “not acceptable to the Administration and would have been severely detrimental to the leadership at DoD [Mr Rumsfeld at the Defence Department]”....
Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.
The notification came in a letter dated January 6, 2004, addressed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney.
In the message, the officials denied the bipartisan commission's request to question terrorist detainees, informing its two senior-most members that doing so would "cross" a "line" and obstruct the administration's ability to protect the nation.
"In response to the Commission...