Charlie Hebdo - The Hidden Agenda Exposed [stormcloudsgathering.com]

Une petite retrospective, 1 mois plus tard et ļes esprits semblent encore congelés. Finalement la guerre contre le terrorisme est enfoncée dans la gorge des derniers sceptiques. S'il y avait une petite chance que certains ouvrent enfin les yeux, elle aété encore réduite à presque rien.

Ce genre d'événement devient tellement sacré. La critique est rendue impossible par un assemblage finement agencé des leviers de pouvoir. Chacun avec son grain de sel. Les médias ont leurs "criticons", les agences gouvernementales ont aussi leurs "lanceurs d'alerte", les militaires leurs "faucons" et leurs modérés. Cet agencement subtil de pour et de contre, de droite et de gauche, de roses et de bruns, de "main-stream" et "discidents" permet un brassage incroyablement fumeux. Un nuage de fumée âcre qui cache l'arbre qui cache la forêt.

On en oubli, et c'est bien là l'objectif, de voir les choses froidement.

* Que s'est-il vraiment passé ? * Qui tire les ficelles si cela s'est passé comme "on" nous le raconte ? * Qu'est ce que l'oération Gladio ? Ça existe tu encore c't'affaire ? * Est-ce un film d'espionage ? * Est-ce l'eouvre du diable ? * Bill Gates ? * Charlie ou Charlo ? * L'aile ou la cuisse ? * L'oeuf ou la poule ?

Toutes ces question sérieuses restent sans réponse et, visiblement, le resteront aussi longtemps que la pression se fera plus forte. Le temps fera son oeuvre.

Cependant, il reste encore matière à penser, je vous suggère de voir le travail de http://stormcloudsgathering.com et de bien d'autres.

Source: http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-cover-up

... If you want a glimpse at just how far they want to take this, look at France. They're already dealing out serious prison sentences for those caught saying anything that could be interpreted as supporting terrorism. Does questioning the official story count as supporting terrorism? Where do you draw the line? Who decides?

Oh, so you don't actually have to support terrorism. Just disagreeing is enough.

Humanity, do you really want to learn this lesson the hard way, again?

They are playing you people: Problem, Reaction, Solution. It's the oldest trick in the book.

With so much riding on this story, obviously there are those who have a vested interest in preventing evidence which contradicts the official narrative from reaching the public.

On January 10th we uploaded a video entitled "Charlie Hebdo Shootings - Censored Video". Within 24 hours it had over a million views. Then the video was age restricted and removed from listings in spite of the fact that it depicted no blood, no gore, no graphic violence of any kind. It did, however, challenge the official narrative of the event. In spite of being age restricted the video continued to grow and added another million views.

Source: http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-cover-up

Éléments du fil RSS

Trump vs. Clinton - The Window of Opportunity

Observing the presidential elections over the years has been a lot like watching a television series jump the shark. We've gotten to that point where you watch it for the same reason you can't help slowing down and staring as you pass a wreck on the highway. It's the Jerry Springerfication of politics. A morbid fascination with the decline of western civilization.

World War III - Who Will Be Blamed?

If you want to start a to war, the unwashed masses must be convinced to send their brothers, sons and fathers to die on the front lines. The specter of an external enemy must be etched into their collective mind through trauma, exaggeration and repetition. History must be whitewashed, twisted and cherry picked down to a politicized nursery rhyme. At no point should the real motives or consequences of such an endeavor be discussed.