$1.6 Billion Reasons Why Activists Say New York City Needs Public Banking

New York City, once the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, is bouncing back. is reopening its doors, international tourists are arriving, and But not all the way. According to the , the city is still just about 80 percent “back.” Hotels are still running , office are at a 30-year high, and small businesses — of which closed in 2020 and 2021 — are facing long roads to recovery. What’s slowing Gotham down? According to critics, the pandemic laid bare the city’s systemic inequalities. COVID-19 infection and death rates were highest in working-class, non-white neighborhoods. Not only did private, for-profit banking aggravate those inequalities, but during the pandemic, JP Morgan Chase also extracted from working-class New Yorkers, according to research from the New Economy Project, a nonprofit organizing around issues of equity and racial justice.  “As New Yorkers struggled, banks smuggled massive sums in predatory fees out of hard hit communities of color,” said , an associate director at the organization.   
“A public bank would be a catalyst for the type of economic development that we frankly see too little of in New York City and cities around the country.” — Andy Morrison
  Meanwhile, those same commercial banks — which by city law must handle the nearly $100 billion in public funds that flow through New York’s public coffers in the form of sales and property taxes, revenue bonds, and federal stimulus cash — pay only “modest” interest rates for holding all that public money, Morrison argued in an published by the New School’s Center for New York City Affairs. Unequal access to resources like capital has long been a problem for working-class and minority communities. White households average nearly eight times the net worth of Black households, and banking practices are one reason why, a Brookings Institution analysis . According to critics like Morrison, this hard reality and New York’s slow recovery all create momentum for New York City to finally set up an alternative to private banks.

Savage Inequalities

JPMorgan Chase, with which New York City does most of its banking, is the worst offender but not alone. Banks have charged New York customers more than since the pandemic began, mainly through overdraft fees but also in ATM fees and monthly “maintenance” fees, as , a coalition dedicated to promoting public banking, announced last summer.
Photo credit:
Before the pandemic hit, more than across the New York metro area were unbanked or underbanked due to expensive bank fees or inequitable access. Activists assert that public banking would go a long way toward addressing those issues and feel that their time has come.

Public Investment: Filling the Void

Though public banks exist in much of the rest of the world, in the United States, the century-old Bank of North Dakota is the only government-run general bank. That may finally be changing. New state laws in California are allowing advocates in San Francisco and Los Angeles to pursue a public option for banking.  In New York, supporters are focused on passing two pieces of legislation. One is the statewide in Albany, which would greatly streamline the process for local governments to set up public banks. The bill is by state Senator James Sanders (D), chairman of the Committee on Banks, and is currently under consideration by that Committee. In addition to assessing predatory fees, the present private banking system neglects the credit needs of lower-income and minority communities, according to critics. Public banking would solve both problems, they say. “A public bank would be a catalyst for the type of economic development that we frankly see too little of in New York City and cities around the country,” Morrison said. “We want to see bottom-up economic development.”  “Bottom-up” economic development would mean funding for worker cooperatives, small businesses, firms owned by immigrants and minorities, as well as lending to underserved neighborhoods neglected by the private banks. It would also mean ready financing for community-based solar energy projects, according to Morrison — who argues that the COVID-19 pandemic reinforced the need for public banking. “This [lack of private investment] has been a problem throughout COVID-19 where small and worker-owned businesses have struggled to get the kind of financial support that they need,” he said. “Particularly, Black-owned, immigrant-owned businesses are already not served by the big banks in challenging times. We think a public bank should be a solution; it would be dedicated to serving small and worker-owned businesses.” Statewide legislation is not the only focus for banking reformers in New York State. They are focused on passing the People’s Bank Act currently before the New York City Council, sponsored by councilmembers and , who have made fighting inequality a centerpiece of their careers.
;s Public Banking Shake-up

Private Divestment: Doing No Harm

Under current New York City law, an obscure city body called the Banking Commission selects the commercial banks that handle the city’s business. According to public bank advocates, the selection process is opaque. There is no disclosure of the fees these banks charge New York for public accounts.  And banks are selected with little transparency. In May, after an 11-minute Zoom meeting with no public input, the Banking Commission redesignated Wells Fargo, which agreed to pay billions in restitution for its fake accounts scandal, as an official city banking partner. Critics assert that not only is the public hurt by the high fees that these banks charge for city deposits, but these banks invest in projects that are harmful to the public interest as well. Private investment in and is cited as destructive to the lives of New York City residents. The would greatly increase the transparency of where the city banks and where it invests the public’s money. It would require the city to , including balances and fees charged.  The city’s Committee on Finance on the legislation in April. It is still listed as being considered by .

Bullish on Reform

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D), before her political career, has not made a public statement about whether she supports the New York Public Banking Act. Nor has Mayor-elect Eric Adams (D) indicated whether he supports the People’s Bank Act (though he has spoken highly of opening up New York to cryptocurrency and has said he will accept his first ). But backers remain upbeat, in part because of New York’s slow COVID-19 recovery. “The momentum is building,” Morrison said. “We are really excited about it, and we think this is the year for sure. There is definitely a groundswell.” When asked if he would bet money that the next public bank would be in New York State, Morrison did not miss a beat. “I would be all in. We would be all in. In fact, we are all in on this campaign.”  
Feed item Author: 
Glenn Daigon
New York City, once the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, is bouncing back. Broadway is reopening its doors, international tourists are arriving, and workers are returning to jobs." data-share-imageurl="" style="position:fixed;top:0px;right:0px;">

Ajouter un commentaire